Metrics Methodology
Investors' technical reviewers discount self-reported performance numbers by default -- correctly, since most trading-platform marketing sites do not disclose methodology. This page states how ChimeraMiND's numbers are produced so they can be checked rather than taken on faith.
Live status and uptime figures
chimeramind.com/status and the platform's uptime figures are pulled at render time from /monitoring/health and /monitoring/overview, which read from the same Redis-backed health state the backend uses internally -- these are not static marketing copy, they are live reads and will show STBY/Unavailable rather than a fabricated number if the backend is unreachable (see Architecture Overview).
Capability counts (Service Catalog)
Every count in the Service Catalog -- 60 MCP tools, 57 REST route files, 16 strategy modules, 5 ML models, 7 exchange gateways, 14 analytics streams -- is a direct count of code artifacts (registered tools, files, classes), reproducible by anyone with repository access via the same grep/glob commands used to produce them. These are structural counts, not performance claims.
Trading performance numbers
Status: not currently published on the public site. No Sharpe ratio, win-rate, or similar backtested/live performance figure is shown on chimeramind.com today -- deliberately: an unverifiable performance number is worse than no number. Any performance figures published in the future will state the measurement window, whether it is backtested or live/paper, slippage and fee assumptions, and survivorship handling -- consistent with how a quant reviewer would expect a Sharpe ratio to be sourced.
Early traction
As of this writing, 26 users have registered (Supabase auth.users, excluding internal load-test/monitoring accounts and the founder's own accounts). All onboarding is currently paper-mode; no user has submitted a testimonial or case-study review yet, so none is published -- consistent with the no-fabrication policy on this page. This number will be updated as it changes rather than left stale.
What "verified" will mean when performance numbers return
The platform's own paper-trading account (_system, isolated from any real tenant, see Architecture Overview) is the intended source for any republished performance claim, since it runs the identical decision/risk pipeline as live accounts (see Exchange Gateways) without requiring disclosure of any individual user's real trading results. A future independent-verification mechanism (e.g., a read-only exchange API key held by a third party) is a reasonable diligence ask and is not yet built.